|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] performance of a linear algebra/matrix library
From: Kenny Riddile (kfriddile_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-06 14:48:13
DE wrote:
> abstraction penalty i guess
If you mean a language-imposed, inherent abstraction penalty, then I
doubt it (certainly not 33%). You can find out for yourself though:
http://www.stepanovpapers.com/AbstractionPenaltyBenchmark.cpp
> afaik boost LA concerns statically sized matrices
> that's not an option for me personally
There is Eigen which is very fast and supports both statically-sized and
dynamically-sized matrices:
http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/index.php?title=Main_Page
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk