Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_CLASS* not documented
From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-06 22:43:14

Next message: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [ATTN: Noel] Re: bjam's use of O_NONBLOCK in execunix.c"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [paired ptr] Proposing a new smart pointer object formanaging bidirectional relationships between objects"
In reply to: Michael Caisse: "[boost] [fusion] BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_CLASS* not documented"

On 5/7/2010 2:04 AM, Michael Caisse wrote:
> I may be able to submit a patch after boostcon but I thought I would
> first check to see if this is just an issues with the latest docs not
> being checked in. I just verified the trunk is missing docs about the
> class adaption macros.

Yes, it's still undocumented. A patch would be great,
esp, now that the API has stabilized.

Regards,

-- 
Joel de Guzman
http://www.boostpro.com
http://spirit.sf.net
http://www.facebook.com/djowel
Meet me at BoostCon
http://www.boostcon.com/home
http://www.facebook.com/boostcon

Next message: Rene Rivera: "[boost] [ATTN: Noel] Re: bjam's use of O_NONBLOCK in execunix.c"
Previous message: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [paired ptr] Proposing a new smart pointer object formanaging bidirectional relationships between objects"
In reply to: Michael Caisse: "[boost] [fusion] BOOST_FUSION_ADAPT_CLASS* not documented"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk