Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Namespace for a Boost Hashing Library
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-09 12:25:22

>I initially used boost::hash, forgetting that the unordered containers
> have already claimed that name. A number of alternatives have been
> proposed, so I hoped to get some thoughts from the wider community.
> The intention for the library is to provide concepts and some
> implementations for checksums (like CRC32), plain hash functions (for
> hash tables), and cryptographic hash functions (like MD5 or SHA-256).

It seems like these are all natural allies to the stuff already in
boost::hash, what's the issue in also using that name and extending the
existing hash function library?

Just my 2c worth, John.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at