Re: [boost] [LA] vector_traits for setters

Subject: Re: [boost] [LA] vector_traits for setters
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-11 02:19:06

On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:10 PM, Barend Gehrels <barend_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> We did exactly the same for Boost.Geometry (long ago). First have
> non-const-ref getters and lateron moved to setters... Seems it cannot be
> avoided.

I'm interested to know why did you move to setters.

(Regardless, as far as (Boost) LA is concerned, it seems like the use
of setters over mutable references is being forced by the availability
of matrix/vector types that don't provide mutable references
interface.)

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode