Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Isidor Zeuner (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-15 13:40:48
> You can still provide binaries for certain distributions. For instance,
> Ubuntu-8.04 comes with boost-1.34 and libstdc++.so.6. That won't change.
I think this is the best direction for solving the ABI compatibility
issue. Why should a library vendor bother? The library vendor would
sacrifice code quality if he strives for binary compatibility. A
distributor, however, can decide to make binary compatibility
priority, and keep the same boost version for a long time.
So, if I need long-lasting binary compatibility, I can buy RHEL and be
sure everything remains stable. But the developers of all the bundled
software don't need to bother.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk