Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers

Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-15 14:02:36

Hello Boosters,

Some clarifications:

1. I do not suggest the way boost works but I do suggest a community
   to think about something like boost stable.

   Today it is quite feasible to take all tr1 stuff and make it ABI stable
   sacrificing some generality.

   This would give very good to C++.

2. Booster is not a fork of boost but rather small library that allows me
   to get free of boost keeping boost-like API.

There are many discussions about Boost issues today
(i.e. "is boost broken?") - but I think there is important point that
is missed - don't forget about it.

Artyom