Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] New moderators request unclear? (was: A Remedy for the Review Manager Starvation)
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-16 22:23:09

Next message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [iterator] why isn't there a mapped_type iterator adaptor in boost?"
Previous message: Isidor Zeuner: "Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers"
In reply to: Thomas Klimpel: "Re: [boost] New moderators request unclear? (was: A Remedy for the Review Manager Starvation)"

On 16 May 2010 23:56, Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Oh, maybe I completely misunderstood Beman's request then. I'm not a native speaker, but I even looked up "nominate" at <http://dict.leo.org>. It seems to mean something like "to elect somebody". (I had looked it up, because it was unclear to me whether "nomination" includes asking the person for permission first.) But as you put it, it seems to mean something like "to volunteer".
>

FWIW, as a native speaker I also didn't understand Beman's request as
"to volunteer oneself"; I understood it as "to suggest others".

Next message: Mostafa: "Re: [boost] [iterator] why isn't there a mapped_type iterator adaptor in boost?"
Previous message: Isidor Zeuner: "Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers"
In reply to: Thomas Klimpel: "Re: [boost] New moderators request unclear? (was: A Remedy for the Review Manager Starvation)"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk