Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers

Subject: Re: [boost] [Booster] Or boost is useless for library developers
From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-18 08:53:24

On 18/05/10 13:30, Artyom wrote:
> boost::shared_ptr, std::tr1::shared_ptr, std::shared_ptr and my
> booster::shared_ptr is same pointer as it has same interface and same
> semantics - that what is important.

It is plain wrong.
Interface and specification of std::tr1::shared_ptr is
significantly different from std::shared_ptr, so both state
very different types in terms of definition and behaviour.

Best regards,
-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net