Re: [boost] [contract] Boost spoiled function declarations

Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] Boost spoiled function declarations
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-18 15:03:00

On 18 May 2010 19:41, Lorenzo Caminiti <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> I honestly think the only point we were trying to make is that
> Boost.Contract parenthesized syntax should not be excluded *a priori*
> given that Boost.Parameter also spoils function declarations adding a
> comparable amount of syntactic complexity. I am sorry if I gave a
> different impression.

Okay, I misunderstood. I'm sorry that I jumped into the discussion
without understanding the context.

Daniel