Re: [boost] CGI / FastCGI library update

Subject: Re: [boost] CGI / FastCGI library update
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-20 13:56:14

On 20 May 2010 10:58, Artyom <artyomtnk_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> If so give me one reason why should my application be compiled
> for each type of these?
>
> Good luck :-)
>

Give me one reason why I should have to link all of those into my
binary when I only deploy using one of them.

And Thorsten's request is just to make the virtual optional, not to
remove it altogether.  You can still make it runtime-configurable if
you insist.