Subject: Re: [boost] CGI / FastCGI library update
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-20 13:56:14
On 20 May 2010 10:58, Artyom <artyomtnk_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> If so give me one reason why should my application be compiled
> for each type of these?
> Good luck :-)
Give me one reason why I should have to link all of those into my
binary when I only deploy using one of them.
And Thorsten's request is just to make the virtual optional, not to
remove it altogether. You can still make it runtime-configurable if
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk