Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move
From: Thomas Klimpel (Thomas.Klimpel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-21 05:51:18

Next message: Adam Badura: "[boost] [1.43.0][preprocessor] BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH doesn't work recursively"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] BoostCon 2011 Dates and Hotel Discount (this week only!)"
In reply to: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

OvermindDL1 wrote:
> We are approaching the final days of the review and there have been no
> definitive reviews as of yet, and a lot of talk about design and what
> to include or not include. If this continues without any actual
> reviews and none in sight then I will have to end the review period,
> else if we do start to get some reviews then we can issue an extension
> if the Review Wizards agree.

I will try to send in a review till Tuesday.

Regards,
Thomas

Next message: Adam Badura: "[boost] [1.43.0][preprocessor] BOOST_PP_SEQ_FOR_EACH doesn't work recursively"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] BoostCon 2011 Dates and Hotel Discount (this week only!)"
In reply to: OvermindDL1: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"
Next in thread: vicente.botet: "Re: [boost] [Review] Formal Review: Boost.Move"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk