Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Boost.Locale
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-24 15:18:31
> My point is that, if that is implemented correctly, then
> strictly speaking an implementation where sizeof(wchar_t) ==
> 16 will become non-conforming according to 3.9.1/5. Which
> would be interesting to see :)
No, it will not as Micorsoft would not agree. This is why C++0x
gives us char16_t and char32_t.
> As intended by the standard wchar_t should have at least 21
> bits for C++ implementations supporting Unicode,
AFAIK actually wchar_t defined by C and it allowed even
> Looking forward to Boost.Locale review!
Me too :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk