Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Review Request: Boost.Locale
From: Artyom (artyomtnk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-24 15:18:31

> My point is that, if that is implemented correctly, then
> strictly speaking an implementation where sizeof(wchar_t) ==
> 16 will become non-conforming according to 3.9.1/5. Which
> would be interesting to see :)

No, it will not as Micorsoft would not agree. This is why C++0x
gives us char16_t and char32_t.

> As intended by the standard wchar_t should have at least 21
> bits for C++ implementations supporting Unicode,

AFAIK actually wchar_t defined by C and it allowed even

> Looking forward to Boost.Locale review!

Me too :-)



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at