Re: [boost] ryppl and cmake

Subject: Re: [boost] ryppl and cmake
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-24 23:35:49

At Mon, 24 May 2010 22:23:34 -0400,
David Sankel wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 2:10 PM, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> 
> > At Mon, 24 May 2010 19:47:00 +0200,
> > joel falcou wrote:
> > > It seems counterproductive to be tied to git for the distribution part.
> >
> >  At the risk of alienating some people… I believe Git is going to
> >    win the DVCS wars.
> 
> 
> At the risk of alienating myself, I think there is a faulty assumption here.
> I see no reason to believe that there is going to be a clear cut single
> "winner" with DVCS. The systems clearly differentiate themselves. Quality of
> windows OS support, performance, and learning curve are just a few examples.
> If the future turns out as I expect, choice of DVCS is going to be similar
> to a choice of vim or emacs - mac or windows.

I speculate; you speculate.  We'll see. It's just what I predict. 

-- 
Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com