Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for C++?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-27 07:35:50

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [proposal] The boost.org Maintenance Effort"
Previous message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [GIL] 2D kernel convolution"
In reply to: Bartlett, Roscoe A: "Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for C++?"
Next in thread: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for C++?"

Did you consider using type erasure (e.g. boost::function,
http://stlab.adobe.com/classadobe_1_1any__iterator.html, etc.) ?

-- 
Dave Abrahams           Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com

Next message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] [proposal] The boost.org Maintenance Effort"
Previous message: Mateusz Loskot: "Re: [boost] [GIL] 2D kernel convolution"
In reply to: Bartlett, Roscoe A: "Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for C++?"
Next in thread: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for C++?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk