Subject: [boost] ** Please don't overquote **
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-28 14:16:35
At Fri, 28 May 2010 19:16:41 +0200,
<snip entire foregoing message>
> > swap_in_place<>(r) where r is a range (or swap_in_place<>(begin,end), which is
> > provided for convenience) will be zero cost if no work needs to be done, while
> > having the same complexity as the above (but only!) if swapping is required.
> > With the swap_in_place<>() approach, you only pay for what you need (to borrow
> > from the C++ mantra)
> This is not completly true, as your implementation will at least visit the instance.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Moderator