Re: [boost] [move] problem with msvc and BOOST_MOVABLE_BUT_NOT_COPYABLE

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] problem with msvc and BOOST_MOVABLE_BUT_NOT_COPYABLE
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-28 17:51:32

On 28/05/2010 23:30, Ilya Sokolov wrote:
> Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> What do you think?

It's an option, I just was trying to say that we get a similar guarantee 
that a simple rvalue reference based implementation could offer. If we 
should add more guarantees because the compiler diagnostics are not good 
enough, I'm open to suggestions. Adding a base class is not something I 
like because in some C++03 (Msvc I think, empty base classes are not 
optimized with multiple inheritance), although maybe the benefits 
outweigh the problems.

Thanks for your suggestions,

Ion