Re: [boost] [move] problem with msvc and BOOST_MOVABLE_BUT_NOT_COPYABLE

Subject: Re: [boost] [move] problem with msvc and BOOST_MOVABLE_BUT_NOT_COPYABLE
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-29 02:45:55

On 29/05/2010 1:29, Thomas Klimpel wrote:
> The idea by Ilya Sokolov to modify the signature of the private copy
> constructor and assignment operator in boost::noncopyable to a
> non-const reference actually seems to make perfect sense.

It's a good option, but I'm still reluctant. Adding a base class in 
boost namespace has also implications with ADL and it's unnecessary for 
compilers with deleted definitions (= delete). I need a bit more time to 
see pros/cons.

Best,

Ion