Subject: Re: [boost] [gil] Is bit_aligned_pixel_iterator a standard conformant random access iterator?
From: Lubomir Bourdev (lbourdev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-05-31 15:09:56
On 5/31/10 5:33 AM, "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> At Sun, 30 May 2010 16:27:29 -1000,
> Christian Henning wrote:
>> One of the folks over at MSDN thinks that bit_aligned_pixel_iterator
>> isn't implemented correctly with the interator_facade. He/She also
>> thinks that iterator isn't fully standard compliant since it doesn't
>> give a real reference but a proxy object instead when deferencing. I'm
>> not sure if that's correct. Anyone knows if that's true or not.
> It is indeed correct that ForwardIterator (and thus
> RandomAccessIterator) forbids the use of proxy references. That
> restriction is supposed to be dropped in C++0x.
That is unfortunate because in many places in GIL we require a proxy
reference - such as dereferencing a planar pixel, for example. I don't see a
way to avoid having proxy references... And we do want GIL iterators to be
random access iterators.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk