|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] Mutexes claim a Windows event handle
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-03 08:45:08
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peters, Richard" <richard.peters_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 1:50 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] Mutexes claim a Windows event handle
> I'll explain our architecture at a high level, and see if we can come up
> with a better way of locking.
>
> Those 100.000 'objects' are in fact print jobs in a print controller.
> Each job contains the structure describing what the job looks like
> (sheets and pages and such, among with their attributes like stapling or
> how the bitmaps should be rotated), stuff for maintaining progress and
> accounting, a pipeline of objects doing all sorts of manipulations like
> making it a duplex job or creating booklets of it, etc. A job is
> constructed by either ripping a document (for instance postscript) or by
> scanning a document. This ripping or scanning is kind of repeated after
> a user edited the job on the user interface. All the while, the printer
> wants to get information from the job, in order to be able to print the
> job while it's still ripping.
Do you confirm that you want to have up to 100.000 printer jobs concurrently?
Best,
Vicente
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk