Re: [boost] [Beman's endian] explicit native endianes

Subject: Re: [boost] [Beman's endian] explicit native endianes
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-04 08:50:04

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Terry Golubiewski" <tjgolubi_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [Beman's endian] explicit native endianes

> 
>> I see that there are specific classes for native endian, 
>> endian<endianness::native, ...>.
>> I was wondering if instead of defining a separated class we can not define 
>> endianness::native depending on the ENDIAN of the host and remove the 
>> explicit definition.
> 
> That's what my design does.  I've been using it for several years.  I don't 
> know if it would break Beman's though.

I had made the change and every thing works well :)

Best,
Vicente