Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Fourth release, requesting preliminary review again
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-04 10:03:59


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chad Nelson" <chad.thecomfychair_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2010 3:37 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [xint] Fourth release, requesting preliminary review again

> That would work for addition, subtraction, and multiplication. It
> definitely wouldn't for division (which is more code than the
> aforementioned three combined). I'm not sure which of the others it
> would be possible for offhand, but I suspect it would be less than half
> of them.

This is a good pecentage. Isn't it?

Vicente


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk