Subject: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build"
From: Vladimir Prus (vladimir_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-07 06:05:12
It looks like somebody went via Trac and moved some issues from the
"Building Boost" component to "build" component. See, for example:
I certainly appreciate help with triaging issues, but in general, such
change seems wrong -- "Building Boost" is for issues affecting exactly
that -- building boost, while the 'build' component contain issues
that are not necessary affecting Boost C++ Libraries at all.
Unfortunately, the changes are all anonymous, so it would be great if whoever
made them speak up, and discuss the rationale.
-- Vladimir Prus CodeSourcery vladimir_at_[hidden] (650) 331-3385 x722
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk