Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for

Subject: Re: [boost] Review of a safer memory management approach for
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-07 07:13:00

...and you can't detect ambiguities and other overload failures at  
compile-time.

[sent from tiny mobile device]

On Jun 7, 2010, at 5:34 AM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden] 
 > wrote:

> I believe that in the pure form of OO, all functions are multimethods.
> This basically makes it work like overloading, except it's  
> dynamically typed.