Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build"
From: Vicente Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-07 10:20:39

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Active Tickets report and accepted info"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] Active Tickets report and accepted info"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""

Does #2790 Executable bit is lost on windows builds
<https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2790> belongs to Boost Build or to
build component?

BTW, who is the maintainer of Boost Build?

Best,
Vicente

-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/-trac--%22Building-Boost%22-vs.-%22build%22-tp28803264p28805887.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Marshall Clow: "Re: [boost] Active Tickets report and accepted info"
Previous message: Stewart, Robert: "Re: [boost] Active Tickets report and accepted info"
In reply to: Vladimir Prus: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""
Next in thread: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""
Reply: Rene Rivera: "Re: [boost] [trac] "Building Boost" vs. "build""

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk