Re: [boost] [proto] small breaking change

Subject: Re: [boost] [proto] small breaking change
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-09 08:24:31

On 6/9/2010 2:05 AM, joel falcou wrote:
> Eric Niebler wrote:
>> You'll get basic_expr instead of expr automatically if you use either of
>> proto::generator or proto::pod_generator. That could surprise you if you
>> were expecting to get an expr, so beware. Most normal uses of Proto will
>> just work with this change, though, and if you measure you should see a
>> modest improvement in your compile times
>
> What's the protocol to get the old expr back ? Should we write
> a custom generator or is there any already ?

I'll add one. Can you say why you want it?

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com