Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [serialization] Boost.DateTime tests failing
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-09 14:17:08


I've been working on it.

Note that even though this is entirely unintentional, It's a perfect
example of why I believe that each library on the trunk should be tested
against
release branch rather than the rest of the trunk.

Robert Ramey

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> I see that a few tests of Boost.DateTime (see [1] for instance) are
> failing because Boost.Serialization fails to complile. It seems like
> revision 62546 caused this. Robert, will you take a look at it?
>
> [1]
> <http://www.boost.org/development/tests/trunk/developer/Sandia-darwin-4-0-1-date_time-darwin-4-0-1-testgreg_serialize-variants_.html>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk