Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [interprocess] (Win32) shared memory totally doesn't work :(
From: David M. Cotter (me_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-15 15:40:56


has nobody run into this issue? does anyone have any hint for me? i'm afraid to deploy release software with the "fix" below, i don't really know what the implications might be.

-dave

On Jun 14, 2010, at 5:21 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:

> to be perfectly clear:
> each time i call get_system_time_of_day_information() , i get the SAME number in the high 32 bits but a DIFFERENT number in the low 32bits. of info.data.liKeBootTime.
>
> if i do this right after the call:
> info.data.liKeBootTime &= 0xFFFFFFFF00000000;
>
> then everything works as expected.
>
> On Jun 14, 2010, at 4:28 PM, David M. Cotter wrote:
>
>> so in process A i do this:
>>
>> shared_memory_object obj(create_only, "guid of some kind", read_write);
>>
>> during the construction of that object, it makes a call to "get_boot_time_str()" to construct a folder name based on the boot time. this makes sense, so process B can locate the SAME folder, cuz the boot time is the same, right?
>>
>> well, wrong.
>>
>> you see, the function *says* get_BOOT_time, but it is actually getting boot PLUS SYSTEM (current) time. which is going to be different for the two processes, unless they made the call at the *exact* same time.
>>
>> so it would seem, unless i'm totally misunderstanding this, that it is impossible to use the shared memory thing as it is implemented.
>>
>> if i *remove* the part where it relies on SYSTEM time and only let it use BOOT time, everything works as documented and as expected.
>>
>> what is this about? i'm so curious how other people could be using this?
>>
>> -dave
>


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk