Re: [boost] Future of Vault (was: Vault - multiple C/C++ files versus a compressed one)

Subject: Re: [boost] Future of Vault (was: Vault - multiple C/C++ files versus a compressed one)
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-06-23 17:59:29

At Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:10:08 -0700,
Scott McMurray wrote:
> 
> On 22 June 2010 17:49, David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Now that http://filetolink.com exists (and will automatically zip any
> > multi-file uploads), I'm inclined to move everything there and close
> > down the vault.  We could add an index page on the wiki so the “vault
> > contents” would be browsable.  Opinions?  Objections?
> >
> 
> I'd be more tempted to close the "vault" idea and require that things
> go in the sandbox instead.

Actually I agree.  Especially since, if things go the way I'd like,
the sandbox will just be a bunch of Git repositories in not too long:
http://ryppl.org

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com