Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] A few submissions
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-04 16:58:17
Zitat von Andrey Semashev <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>:
>> a better implementation of the existing thread_specific_ptr interface
>> can be almost as efficient as static_thread_specific_ptr. there is one
>> additional indirection (two in the prototype implementation), but it is
>> just as efficient as thread_local otherwise.
> How do you work around the problem with delay loaded dlls?
I suppose platforms that have that problem can be supported by hiding
the TLS vector behind a function call, or if the platform doesn't
support global TLS but supports TLS that is local to the DLL the
pointer to the TLS vector could be obtained under a mutex lock for
each module. note that this implementation only uses one TLS variable.
if it can't be supported you'd have to fall back to TlsAlloc etc.
I think this rather obscure use case should not punish most use cases.
Vicente has performed some performance tests of Boost.Transact (that
uses static_thread_specific_ptr) on different platforms, some
supporting TLS, some don't.
IIRC it is pretty much unusable on platforms that don't.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk