Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?

Subject: Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?
From: Edd Dawson (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-05 19:45:21

On 7/6/2010 12:21 AM, Sohail Somani wrote:
> On 10-07-05 5:27 PM, Edd Dawson wrote:
>> Did you manage to do a compatability check some other way?
>
> Why not compare the type_info objects?

The Qt signal is specified as a string, so one can't get type_infos for its 
parameters.

I guess it might be possible to pass a pointer to the Qt signal method instead. 
Is that something you've tried?

Cheers,

Edd