Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?

Subject: Re: [boost] [function_types] is there an equivalent for functors?
From: Edd Dawson (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-05 20:40:11

On 7/6/2010 1:30 AM, Sohail Somani wrote:
> On 10-07-05 7:45 PM, Edd Dawson wrote:
>> The Qt signal is specified as a string, so one can't get type_infos for
>> its parameters.
>
> Oh right, duh. Ignore me. So I guess this compatibility is caught at
> signal connection time, right?

Yep.

>> I guess it might be possible to pass a pointer to the Qt signal method
>> instead. Is that something you've tried?
>
> Nope. You've got the right idea. With overloaded signals, I think it
> will be a pain.

Agreed!

Edd