Subject: Re: [boost] Suggested change to type_traits/function_traits
From: Barend Gehrels (barend_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-14 05:10:17
> 2. Have an inner arg struct, templated over an integer indicating
> which argument you want. So instead of:
> typedef some_type arg0_type;
> typedef some_other_type arg1_type;
> You would have:
> template<int i>
> struct arg
> struct arg<0>
> typedef some_type type;
> struct arg<1>
> typedef some_other_type type;
> // etc.
> I think this would make function_traits more usable for
> metaprogramming. As is, to access the different argN_types you have to
> resort to using boost preprocessor. For backwards compatibility the
> old interface could co-exist with the new one.
The Boost function_types library which I'm using since yesterday is more
like this (but not exactly like this) and defining meta-functions and
Besides that it has the advantage that it works for both normal
functions and for member functions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk