Re: [boost] Does boost help in creating generic function wrappers?

Subject: Re: [boost] Does boost help in creating generic function wrappers?
From: Torri, Stephen CIV NSWCDD, W15 (stephen.torri_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-16 12:03:12

>From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden] on behalf of Andy Venikov
>Sent: Fri 7/16/2010 11:57 AM
>To: boost_at_[hidden]
>Subject: Re: [boost] Does boost help in creating generic function wrappers?
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Andy Venikov <avenikov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> BTW, defining result<> seems to be not necessary, but I think it's a good
>> idea to have it.
>
>You're right, it is necessary. I just took result<> out and sure enough
>I get a compiler error inside result_of. I really don't know why I
>thought yesterday that it compiled fine. Man, too many errors for a test
>program... :-(

Rather than being discouraged from having too many errors consider them many opportunities to practice what we know.
 
Stephen