Subject: Re: [boost] Bug in boost graph library
From: Andrew Sutton (andrew.n.sutton_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-16 17:26:16
> Would it be appropriate to return a filter iterator for non-associative
> That would produce the right semantics, but I'm not sure it satisfies the
> performance requirements (since stepping the filter_iterator can take
> arbitrarily long). We can certainly do it, though. Do you think it's good
> to put in?
Not really. I'm not sure there are that many people actually using the
functionality. If somebody really wants it, we could provide it.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk