Subject: Re: [boost] New name of bjam.exe
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-20 11:23:17
At Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:13:09 +0400,
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> > Honestly, if we're going to pick a totally arbitrary name, I'd
> > prefer leaving it alone.
> I agree. The problem we're starting with is that "bjam.exe" is not
> correlated to "Boost.Build" at all. Replacing "bjam.exe" with something
> totally random will only create more confusion.
Maybe the whole system should be called bjam.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com