Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-21 16:20:55
On 21 July 2010 22:00, Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I failed to increment this library version # -
Would it be a good idea to have a point release with just this fixed?
I guess it's such a trivial fix that it wouldn't need as much testing
as a normal release and I think it's worth the effort.
We should at least add a warning to the 1.43 release notes on the
website. If you write it, I'll add it for you.
> Normally I would say don't hold a release
> for any issue in a particular library. I'm giving
> myself a break here because the longer I wait
> the larger the number of archives will be created
> that require the fix. It's like an oil spill - the
> longer you let it go the bigger the problem.
I agree. This seems like an exceptional situation to me.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk