Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-26 07:05:00
[sent from tiny mobile device]
On Jul 26, 2010, at 1:56 AM, "Robert Ramey" <ramey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> As I've said - I just never thought about this. On
> the other hand, I don't think the "detail" interface
> has changed very much (if at all) over time. I can't
> honestly say I know this - because as I've said -
> I never thought about it. I suspect that it hasn't
> changed much because we haven't had much
> if any breakage originating in this area.
Careful and consistent application of the boost concept check library
would have caught any problem arising from models not satisfying
stated concepts and operations relying on more than documented concept
requirements. In fact, after this release would be a good time to
apply BCCL to both libraries, to avoid such issues in the future.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk