Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta progress?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-07-28 16:00:52
Matthias Troyer wrote:
> On 28 Jul 2010, at 11:50, Robert Ramey wrote:
> All you need to do is document what a class deriving from common
> archive has to implement. These are
> - the save/load function for
> - a well-defined set of primitive types with a well-defined interfaced
OK - that's not too bad. I'll find a place to put it into the
There's around 10 of them and they're all convertable to some
type of C++ integer so it shouldn't be too hard.
My list of requirements on these is
convertible to some type of c++ integer
having serialization trait "primitive"
Do you want to add default constructble as well? As I said
I haven't needed it and think that needing this is likely an
error - but I would add it if you think it's necessary.
> - and save_binary/load_binary.
I think this is already specified by the archive concept.
>> But he also got
>> surprised when I changed class_id_type from unsigned
>> int to least_16_t which surprised me since I thought
>> the latter was just a typedef and not a true class.
>Actually not. The breaking was caused by another change you did at the same
Would adding the above information address this as well?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk