Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta release candidate available
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-03 13:47:22
Vladimir Prus wrote:
> Actually, as far as Boost.Build tests are concerned, there's no particular
> emergency. Historically, those tests tend to care a lot about testing
> environment, so one better look only on gcc and msvc test results. Those
> reveal that 'print' test is failing everywhere -- which is something I've
> missed, but is not important.
This is my fault. I just committed a fix to the trunk.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk