Subject: Re: [boost] boost.lockfree update
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-04 20:19:47
Oleg Grunin wrote:
> All this said, I have to say that the fifo performance in our
> environment (64 bit linux with 8 xeon processors, gcc 4.5) was quite
> good. Comparable with tbb::concurrent_queue and way better than all
> the other options we tried.
Did your application use a queue of PODS, structures, or pointers?
>From you post, it sounds like the second isn't supported.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk