Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] boost.lockfree update
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-04 20:19:47

Oleg Grunin wrote:

> All this said, I have to say that the fifo performance in our
> environment (64 bit linux with 8 xeon processors, gcc 4.5) was quite
> good. Comparable with tbb::concurrent_queue and way better than all
> the other options we tried.

Did your application use a queue of PODS, structures, or pointers?
>From you post, it sounds like the second isn't supported.

Robert Ramey

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at