Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [GIL] kth_channel_view
From: fabien.castan_at_[hidden]
Date: 2010-08-05 11:02:31


Yes, it works fine without const.
I used const automatically because I don't write in my image but I don't think it changes something.
So without seems to be better because it's not the correct way to deal with const inside gil.

I don't know how we can declare a parameter to be a const view...
For example a simple function that takes an image v and returns if it contains a pixel p:

template<class MyGilConstView>
bool f( const MyGilConstView& v, const MyGilConstView::value_type& p );

This function can't garantee that it doesn't modify the image v and the pixel p.

I can create a const view at the begining of the function, to get this garantee, like this:
typedef MyGilConstView::const_t MyGilReallyConstView;
typedef MyGilReallyConstView::value_type MyGilReallyConstPixel; // as there is no const_t typedef in pixel type...
MyGilReallyConstView cv = v;
MyGilReallyConstPixel cp = p;

Is it correct ?
Is there a better way to do it ?


PS: maybe a "typedef value_type pixel_t" inside the view class can be a good thing for readability ?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at