Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44] Beta release candidate available
From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-05 14:09:15
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Vladimir Prus
> Actually, as far as Boost.Build tests are concerned, there's no particular
> emergency. Historically, those tests tend to care a lot about testing
> environment, so one better look only on gcc and msvc test results. Those
> reveal that 'print' test is failing everywhere -- which is something I've
> missed, but is not important.
Expected failures tend to hide real failures, and make it hard to tell
at a glace if a library has problems that need to be addressed. That's
why we have the markup mechanism. So please either fix the failures or
mark them up as expected.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk