Subject: Re: [boost] [chrono] v0.4.5 Documentation update + warnings removal + bug fixes
From: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. (jhellrung_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-13 11:35:07
On 8/10/2010 11:00 AM, vicente.botet wrote:
> I have made some minor modifications to the Boost.Chrono library as requested on these mailing lists. The implementaton is stable.
> Even if the review's date is not annonced yet, it will be great if some of you make a pre-review, so the conflicting issues are managed before the review.
Is it necessary for common_type to fallback to Boost.TypeOf in the
absence of decltype? In what situations is (bool ? T : U) not either T,
U, or some additional const/volatile qualifications on T or U, possibly
transposed with some reference or pointer qualifiers?
In other words, when does (bool ? T : U) manufacture some new "3rd type"
out of the blue?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk