Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 11:00:29

Next message: Adam Badura: "[boost] [1.44] [filesystem] filesystem::path construction problems in version 3"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [mpl] unexpected behaviour of mpl::add"
In reply to: Ralf Globisch: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"
Reply: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"

AMDG

Ralf Globisch wrote:
> The same thing happened to me. One can define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
> to stop the warnings from appearing but I would prefer it if the problem could be fixed
> at source of the warnings. I'm guessing this can't be fixed until version 1.45?
>

We decided long ago that these warnings can't be
reliably fixed from within Boost.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Next message: Adam Badura: "[boost] [1.44] [filesystem] filesystem::path construction problems in version 3"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [mpl] unexpected behaviour of mpl::add"
In reply to: Ralf Globisch: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"
Next in thread: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"
Reply: Andrey Semashev: "Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk