Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done

Subject: Re: [boost] [gsoc] Boost.Process done
From: Jeff Flinn (TriumphSprint2000_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 15:23:28

Boris Schaeling wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2010 01:18:56 +0200, Daniel Trebbien 
> <dtrebbien_at_[hidden]> wrote:

...

>> [...]For some reason it looked strange to me that the
>> find_executable_in_pathfunction returned a string rather than a Boost
>> Filesystem
>> path object. It's not that big of a deal, though, because I could 
>> construct
>> a path from a string if I really wanted.
> 
> You are right, path makes sense here. I can change this if it is preferred?

+1

Jeff