Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings

Subject: Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 16:20:48

AMDG

Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 19.08.2010 19:00, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> Ralf Globisch wrote:
>>> The same thing happened to me. One can define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
>>> to stop the warnings from appearing but I would prefer it if the
>>> problem could be fixed
>>> at source of the warnings. I'm guessing this can't be fixed until
>>> version 1.45?
>>
>> We decided long ago that these warnings can't be
>> reliably fixed from within Boost.
>
> I think I worked around it in revision 64931.

Your fix looks like a good thing regardless of the warnings,
since it avoid extraneous instantiations of basic_string.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

P.S. The usual policy is to wait for the trunk tests to cycle
before merging to the release branch.