Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [tokenizer] 1.44 VS compiler warnings
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-19 16:20:48


Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On 19.08.2010 19:00, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> Ralf Globisch wrote:
>>> The same thing happened to me. One can define _SCL_SECURE_NO_WARNINGS
>>> to stop the warnings from appearing but I would prefer it if the
>>> problem could be fixed
>>> at source of the warnings. I'm guessing this can't be fixed until
>>> version 1.45?
>> We decided long ago that these warnings can't be
>> reliably fixed from within Boost.
> I think I worked around it in revision 64931.

Your fix looks like a good thing regardless of the warnings,
since it avoid extraneous instantiations of basic_string.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

P.S. The usual policy is to wait for the trunk tests to cycle
before merging to the release branch.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at