Re: [boost] [fusion] Any chance we can incorporate more folds?

Subject: Re: [boost] [fusion] Any chance we can incorporate more folds?
From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-20 23:58:12

On 8/20/2010 11:40 PM, Larry Evans wrote:
> On 08/20/10 16:21, Steven Watanabe wrote:
> [snip]
>>
>> We already have reverse_fold, which makes 2/4.
>>
> fusion::reverse_fold takes the sequence as the first argument.
> In contrast, the haskell function takes the sequence as the last
> argument.  
<snip>

Fusion and mpl are trying to be consistent with the STL algorithms, not
Haskell (fold == accumulate).

-- 
Eric Niebler
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com