Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44][Serialization] fails to compile on OSX universal
From: Emil Dotchevski (emil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-21 17:36:15
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:09 PM, David Irvine <david.irvine_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ... boost being the closest to
> a c++ standards extension library in many cases, it does arguably
> require definitive policy on warnings (excuse my ignorance if this
We do have a warnings policy but I don't think it is very useful. A
warnings policy can be useful in a corporate environment where it can
be part of an overall strategy aimed at improving efficiency. For
Boost users, any warning in Boost is unwanted noise.
Reverge Studios, Inc.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk