Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-22 21:01:49

Next message: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Previous message: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Serialization] Serialization regressions (was Re: Boost.Thread test results in Boost.Tokenizer)"
In reply to: Mathieu -: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Reply: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"

On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Mathieu - <ptr.jetable_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I might be totally wrong here but I don't see how it's different from lambdas...

What can it do differently from boost::phoenix? I am guessing you
just create and instance a struct right there, but boost::phoenix
would be more succinct.

Next message: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Previous message: Matthias Troyer: "Re: [boost] [Boost.Serialization] Serialization regressions (was Re: Boost.Thread test results in Boost.Tokenizer)"
In reply to: Mathieu -: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Next in thread: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"
Reply: Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr.: "Re: [boost] [local_function] any interest in a LocalFunction library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk