Subject: Re: [boost] [1.44][Serialization] fails to compile on OSX universal
From: Stewart, Robert (Robert.Stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-08-23 11:58:54
Robert Ramey wrote:
> FYI - after I did this, I was left with a few warnings still.
> I couldn't
> quiet them in a way that I found acceptable so I just left them in.
> The main one was comparison between signed/unsigned ints in a
> few cases. So I think the goal of warning elimination is not
> worth persuing. The goal should be warning minimization. From
> my perspective this is doable and helpful.
I can't argue against your pragmatic viewpoint, but you're missing support for Boost users that like to make errors of warnings. That's a means to force dealing with all warnings. Using pragmas to suppress your remaining warnings would address that constituency.
Rob Stewart robert.stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer, Core Software using std::disclaimer;
Susquehanna International Group, LLP http://www.sig.com
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk